Re: wxWindows licence
On Wed, 23 Aug 2000, Ron wrote:
> What I was trying (perhaps badly) to make explicit in the summary is that
> not all the code used to build the debs may fall under the terms of the
> exception, some may be pure LGPL, in which case anyone wanting to produce
> non-free apps with the wxwin .debs would have to check the licencing of
> what they were using closely.
Or even, potentially, GPL, if rumours about future releases of Qt turn
out to be true, and I finally get on with writing the wxQt port.