Re: cpufreq_conservative on Lenny AMD64? [SOLVED]
> Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uhlar@fantomas.sk>:
> >
> > On 22.04.09 20:42, s. keeling wrote:
> > > I discovered the powernow_k8 module wasn't loaded. Now that it is,
> > > cpufreq-set has rolled both cores back to 500 MHz using ondemand.
> >
> > Doesn't acpi-cpufreq work for you? I have intel core2duo, but that one was
> > recommended over using cpeedstep-centrino, which worked too...
On 23.04.09 20:26, s. keeling wrote:
> I'd never heard of acpi-cpufreq. However:
>
> -----------------
> (0) [root] infidel /root_ modprobe acpi-cpufreq
> FATAL: Error inserting acpi_cpufreq (/lib/modules/2.6.26-1-686/kernel/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.ko): Device or resource busy
Now I see in kernel source docs that acpi_cpufreq is only preferred over
speedstep_centrino and powernow_k8 should do the job if compiled with acpi
support (which shoule be the case of debian kernels). OK, just continue
using powernow_k8, acpi_cpufreq apparently won't work better for you.
Sorry for the disturbing ;)
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Spam = (S)tupid (P)eople's (A)dvertising (M)ethod
Reply to: