Re: pro's and con's of Evolution mail reader?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 15 July 2002 18:09, Gale Stafford wrote:
> I've been using Kmail for a month now with only a few problems. But I'm
> hearing good things about Evolution. I have just 80 MB of RAM, though. How
> does Evolution compare to other mail readers in memory usage?
Stay with KMail. Evo is fine if you want a calender, addressbook and
mailreader all rolled into one. Evo does all that, but it is not very good in
either of these fields. I have not found a way to bounce mails, etc. which
was so annoying that I switched away from Evo again. It can handle GPG/PGP
encrypted mails, but it does not do so very well either.
The big pro of evolution is that it is fast. It used to be the only mailer
able to handle my huge mailboxes (up to 65K mails). That was the reason why I
started using it. Nowadays kmail is as fast, so I'm back with that.
- --
Gruss,
Tobias
- ------------------------------------------------------------
Tobias Hunger The box said: 'Windows 95 or better'
tobias@fresco.org So I installed Linux.
- ------------------------------------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE9M/Euv0FZW3NyoqURAl30AJkBmvaR+sIOBiosH0zFS6lTduMS9ACfXbEh
9Z8GoQjwtPIlBpVNTTy3tiw=
=Le2c
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-laptop-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: