Re: volume control keys (gateway 9300)
On Tue, 29 Aug 2000, sen_ml@eccosys.com wrote:
> oops, now i think i see that you want to control the volume directly
> via some of your keys. in that case, i don't think aumix will work
> for you. sorry about that.
>
> From: sen_ml@eccosys.com
> Subject: Re: volume control keys (gateway 9300)
> Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 13:32:46 +0900
> Message-ID: <[🔎] 20000830133246L.1001@eccosys.com>
>
> > From: Nabil Hathout <Nabil.Hathout@univ-tlse2.fr>
> > Subject: volume control keys (gateway 9300)
> > Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 06:19:04 +0200 (CEST)
> > Message-ID: <[🔎] 14764.35640.516913.859845@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
> >
> > > I have installed a debian potato on a gateway solo 9300. Every thing
> > > seems to be ok except the modem (that is normal since it is a
> > > winmodem) and the top keys that control the volume. Wathever I do,
> > > the volume staus as it was set under windows 98.
> >
> > what is it precisely that you have done?
> >
> > > Does anyone know how I can regain control on the volume or in what
> > > direction I should look for a solution ?
> >
> > what has worked for me is the aumix program that comes in the aumix
> > package (but i have never used a gateway laptop w/ gnu/linux).
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-laptop-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
I have a Gateway solo 2150 (Happily running woody) and I was actually
thinking of writing a program to allow you to use the volume and shortcut
keys. If anyone would be interested in this let me know.
Dan
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Daniel E. Baumann
E-mail: baumannd@msoe.edu (preferred)
baumannd@penguinpowered.com
baumannd@obfuscation.penguinpowered.com (caution: dynamic DNS)
Web location: http://www.msoe.edu/~baumannd
http://www.linuxfreak.com/~baumannd
"Life would be so much easier if we could just look at the source code."
-- Dave Olson
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to: