Hello,
On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 01:27:03PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Wednesday 26 January 2005 05:21, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > OK, so this is something you have to discuss among yourselves. I'm not
> > very familiarized with the l10n process in Debian, but: do you think
> > it'd make sense to X-Debbugs-CC: the appropriate -l10n- list upon
> > submitting INTL bugs?
>
> Yes, I think this makes sense.
I disagree, but I seem to be in a minority here. I'd really like to
keep this to *discussions* about german translations, not
proofreading. Would it be possible to shift all this proofreading
which more and more pops up here to a second list?
Greetings
Helge
--
Helge Kreutzmann, Dipl.-Phys. Helge.Kreutzmann@itp.uni-hannover.de
gpg signed mail preferred
64bit GNU powered http://www.itp.uni-hannover.de/~kreutzm
Help keep free software "libre": http://www.freepatents.org/
Attachment:
pgpjHFTop47_P.pgp
Description: PGP signature