Hi Justin, On 21-11-15 20:46, Justin B Rye wrote: >> This may be a good idea. I must admit that I, as a non-native speaker, >> don't have a clear feeling of the difference between remove and purge, >> except that I know the difference from the behavior of apt. I know you >> can purge hoses and volumes with gas. > > And dissidents, and one's bowels; it has overtones of energetic > (possibly overenthusiastic) cleansing. Right. > Oh, how about replacing "purge"/"remove" with "delete"? > > That is, > [...] Then it will ask if you want to delete the database and > revoke the standard privileges for the user of ${pkg}. > and > Description: Delete the database for ${pkg}? > [...] you can choose to delete the database and > revoke the privileges now. > > It should at least be clear it's not talking about a DBMS package. /me likes delete. But maybe we can still use your earlier idea and be more explicit about that it is the database of the package: [..] Then it will ask if you want to delete the ${pkg} database and revoke the standard privileges for the user of ${pkg}. Would adding one short line to the purge/delete question help enough so that it is worth it? If you no longer have need of the data being stored by ${pkg}, you should choose this option. If you want to keep this data, or if you would rather handle this process manually, you should refuse this option. (Of course, t|Either way, t|T)his option doesn't change your other databases. Paul
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature