Re: Help wanted for template improvements [Bug#805455]
積丹尼 Dan Jacobson wrote:
> >>>>> "JBR" == Justin B Rye <email@example.com> writes:
> JBR> any of them? If so, what did you think?
> Yes I did but they are all too technical.
Is it really so difficult to look at an alternative version of a
message and tell us if it makes it any clearer? *Something* made you
think it was talking about removing mysql, and that something is
either a problem with the way it's written or a problem with the way
you're reading it. Help us narrow that down a bit!
> One may say that just telling the user to have a look at the script that
> is about to be executed is technical too... yes.
That's not the problem. The problem is that your idea for how to fix
a confusing text is to make it longer and more complicated instead of
> But I guess you guys aren't willing to have the program make any
> outright promises about 'don't worry' and what it won't do...
Well, do the words NO WARRANTY ring any bells?
JBR with qualifications in linguistics, experience as a Debian
sysadmin, and probably no clue about this particular package