Re: [RFR] templates://xfonts-traditional/{xfonts-traditional.templates}

[Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>]

Justin B Rye writes ("Re: [RFR] templates://xfonts-traditional/{xfonts-traditional.templates}"):
> In the control file:
> >   These changes make the fonts compatible with the US-ASCII character
> > + set, as UTF-8 is not compatible with ASCII in its usage of the
> > + backquote and some other characters.  With these fonts, pre-2000
>                                         ^
> Ian had double space between sentences; you've changed it to a
> single space elsewhere, but left this one.

Double space is IMO correct typography.

> Or come to think of it just:
> 
>     rather, it automatically generates the required modified fonts for
>     each relevant font.
> 
> (Are "relevant" and "installed" separate variables, or can we assume
> that if they're relevant, they'll be pulled in by dependencies?)

They are separate variables.  Only some installed fonts will be
relevant in this sense.

Ian.