[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [RFR] templates://texlive-base/{templates}

Frank Küster wrote:
> Justin B Rye <jbr@edlug.org.uk> wrote:
>>> My guess is that these descriptions are taken verbatim from CTAN, so
>>> the right change would be introducing consistency in CTAN packages
>>> descriptions... quite a big deal...:)
>> It seems unlikely that the cases where there are missing descriptions
>> are CTAN's fault
> Of course, we do not delete existing descriptions.

Now I'm wondering why we currently have a blank line for (e.g.)
texlive-base's "hyphen-base" and "misc" packages where the oldstable
version gave them descriptions - compare:


Is this related to the fact that a CTAN search finds no such package
names?  If so, I don't see how I'm meant to take the fix upstream...
JBR	with qualifications in linguistics, experience as a Debian
	sysadmin, and probably no clue about this particular package

Reply to: