[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [RFR] Description for package quassel



Thomas Müller wrote:
>>>> Maybe with the word "channels" in there somewhere.  And surely
>>>> there's a label somewhere that describes this design... modular?
>>>> Master/slave?  Or perhaps it's an IRC multiplexer...
> 
> We should not go too far away from the upstream description by inventing new 
> attributes. At http://www.quassel-irc.org/about  upstream explains why quassel 
> is modern, cross-platform and distributed

Or at least, it declares that they're using "distributed" to mean
something different from the normal meaning of the label
"distributed".  Normally it would mean an architecture where nodes
communicate directly with one another across the network, with no
central controller and no single point of failure.

But it's your package, and you're the one we'd be expecting to do
the work of keeping the terminology consistent in README files and
so on, so feel free to pick and choose from our suggestions.

> Well - there is a wiki:
> http://bugs.quassel-irc.org/wiki/quassel-irc

An unwikiishly coherent and useful one, too - it would be a good
idea to at least point at it from the man page's SEE ALSO section.
-- 
JBR	with qualifications in linguistics, experience as a Debian
	sysadmin, and probably no clue about this particular package


Reply to: