[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[LCFC] templates://update-inetd/{templates}



This is the last call for comments for the review of debconf
templates for update-inetd.

The reviewed templates will be sent on Tuesday, February 19, 2008 to the package
maintainer as a bug report and a mail will be sent to this list with
"[BTS]" as a subject tag.


-- 


Template: update-inetd/title
Type: title
_Description: Configuring service: ${service}

Template: update-inetd/ask-several-entries
Type: boolean
Default: true
_Description: Ignore multiple entries and continue without changes?
 There are multiple entries in ${inetdcf} for the '${service}' service.

Template: update-inetd/ask-entry-present
Type: boolean
Default: true
#flag:translate!:3,5
_Description: Leave existing entry and continue without changes?
 An unrecognized entry for ${sservice} was found in ${inetdcf} while
 trying to add the following entry:
 .
 ${newentry}
 .
 The unrecognized entry is:
 .
 ${lookslike}

Template: update-inetd/ask-remove-entries
Type: boolean
Default: false
_Description: Remove inetd entries?
 There are multiple entries in ${inetdcf} for the '${service}' service.
 .
 Please confirm that you agree to remove these entries.

Template: update-inetd/ask-disable-entries
Type: boolean
Default: false
_Description: Disable inetd entries?
 There are multiple entries in ${inetdcf} for the '${service}' service.
 .
 Please confirm that you agree to disable these entries.
Source: update-inetd
Section: admin
Priority: important
Maintainer: Luk Claes <luk@debian.org>
Standards-Version: 3.7.3
Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 6), po-debconf

Package: update-inetd
Architecture: all
Conflicts: netbase (<< 4.27)
Depends: debconf | debconf-2.0
Description: inetd configuration file updater
 This package provides a program used by other packages to
 automatically update /etc/inetd.conf, the configuration file shared
 by all implementations of the Internet super-server.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: