Re: [DICO] backwards compatibility (Was: Re: [RFR] po-debconf://glibc (8 strings, 1 nieuwe))

To: debian-l10n-dutch@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: [DICO] backwards compatibility (Was: Re: [RFR] po-debconf://glibc (8 strings, 1 nieuwe))
From: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 00:26:14 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 200704110026.25412.elendil@planet.nl>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 200704110014.13762.cobaco@linux.be>
References: <[🔎] 20070408222232.7D7B240A805@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org> <[🔎] 200704102314.16026.elendil@planet.nl> <[🔎] 200704110014.13762.cobaco@linux.be>

On Wednesday 11 April 2007 00:14, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
> > (IMHO, IANAL, XGFSZ, TTFN)
>
> waar staat XGFSZ voor ?

Nergens :-) De laatste 3 zijn eigenlijk onzin in deze context.
Ik vindt het wel leuk dat je TTFN wist of hebt kunnen vinden :-)

Attachment: pgp9iaJvmOv5r.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

References:
- Please update debconf PO translation for the package glibc 2.5-0exp6
  - From: Christian Perrier <bubulle@debian.org>
- Re: [DICO] backwards compatibility (Was: Re: [RFR] po-debconf://glibc (8 strings, 1 nieuwe))
  - From: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
- Re: [DICO] backwards compatibility (Was: Re: [RFR] po-debconf://glibc (8 strings, 1 nieuwe))
  - From: "cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis)" <cobaco@linux.be>

Prev by Date: Re: [DICO] character set (WAS: Re: [RFR] po-debconf://glibc (8 strings, 1 nieuwe))
Next by Date: Re: [DICO] character set (WAS: Re: [RFR] po-debconf://glibc (8 strings, 1 nieuwe))
Previous by thread: Re: [DICO] backwards compatibility (Was: Re: [RFR] po-debconf://glibc (8 strings, 1 nieuwe))
Next by thread: Re: [RFR] po-debconf://glibc (8 strings, 1 nieuwe)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread