Re: desiderata (was Re: [debian-knoppix] Is Knoppix dead?)

To: Knoppix-Debian <debian-knoppix@linuxtag.org>
Subject: Re: desiderata (was Re: [debian-knoppix] Is Knoppix dead?)
From: Boto <boto.too@email.it>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 10:30:42 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 408782B2.9070105@email.it>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 4086B613.8040105@dico.unimi.it>
References: <[🔎] Pine.GSO.3.96.1040418114427.15129A-100000@beach.silcom.com> <[🔎] 40857006.3000905@pdistributors.com> <[🔎] 40864542.30401@dico.unimi.it> <[🔎] 200404211158.51115.gpelleti@enter-net.com> <[🔎] 4086B613.8040105@dico.unimi.it>

Andrea Trentini wrote:

just one: me


Ehi...! and I?

Francesco


Scuseme if I wrote in private.


--
Boto - Linux User #340148
Knoppix 3.3 (Debian testing/unstable)
Kernel 2.4.22-ac2 (I update, one moment...) - Ion2

 --- La semplicita` e` la vera grandezza ---

_______________________________________________
debian-knoppix mailing list
debian-knoppix@linuxtag.org
http://mailman.linuxtag.org/mailman/listinfo/debian-knoppix

Reply to:

References:
- Re: [debian-knoppix] Is Knoppix dead?
  - From: Chad Page <cpage@silcom.com>
- Re: [debian-knoppix] Is Knoppix dead?
  - From: Nicholas Vettese <nvettese@pdistributors.com>
- desiderata (was Re: [debian-knoppix] Is Knoppix dead?)
  - From: Andrea Trentini <trentini@dico.unimi.it>
- Re: desiderata (was Re: [debian-knoppix] Is Knoppix dead?)
  - From: Gilles Pelletier <gilpel@altern.org>
- Re: desiderata (was Re: [debian-knoppix] Is Knoppix dead?)
  - From: Andrea Trentini <trentini@dico.unimi.it>

Prev by Date: Re: desiderata (was Re: [debian-knoppix] Is Knoppix dead?)
Next by Date: [debian-knoppix] Knoppix c't boot options
Previous by thread: Re: desiderata (was Re: [debian-knoppix] Is Knoppix dead?)
Next by thread: Re: [debian-knoppix] Is Knoppix dead?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread