On Sat, 2011-05-14 at 10:52 -0700, Brad Boyer wrote: > On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 07:11:51AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 06:13, Finn Thain <fthain@telegraphics.com.au> wrote: > > > On Thu, 12 May 2011, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > >> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 09:24, Finn Thain <fthain@telegraphics.com.au> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > > >> > On Thu, 12 May 2011, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > >> > > > >> >> Do we really want to compile wireless on m68k? AFAIK we don't have > > >> >> any. > > >> > > > >> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-m68k&m=128628785718187&w=2 > > >> > > > >> > I suspect this list is also applicable to atari and amiga (?) > > > > > > Excepting the PS2 mouse I should add. (And is there PCMCIA on > > > atari/amiga?) > > > > Yes, so far used only by the apne network driver. > > Is there any technical reason we couldn't have a normal PCMCIA socket > driver for the Amiga and use the pcnet_cs driver for this case? I know > it would be a fair amount of work even if it is possible, but I'm > curious to know if there was anything other than a historical reason. Might just be historical, but the Amiga PCMCIA sockets are a little non-standard (based on a draft of the 2.0 standard, I believe). Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part