Bug#604096: Bug#601341: Bug#602418: #601341, #602418 and #604096 seem to be duplicates
> Dave's concerns seemed mainly to be about AGP bits rather than PCI, are
Yeah, his concerns are valid: why touch it if nobody is using it. And
if truly there aren't enough folks being interested in AGP support, then
I am fine dropping it.
> they independent(-ish)? e.g. is only a subset of the .../480 series is
The PCI cards I am taking about are the .. PCI Matrox G400 or
like, so even older than AGP cards.
> needed to enable PCI support?
You know, I might have not actually posted a patch for this. It was one
of those DRM scattergather code. <shrugs>
Reply to: