On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 11:52:10AM +0200, Stefan Bader wrote: > On 08/30/2010 02:27 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > On Sun, 2010-08-29 at 16:26 -0700, Brad Figg wrote: > >> On 08/29/2010 02:17 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: [...] > >>> I'm interested in cooperating in this. > >>> > >>> I have prepared a git branch with drm changes from 2.6.34.3 up to > >>> 2.6.34.6 as a basis for Debian kernel updates. I can make that > >>> public and post the patches for review if you want to consider > >>> pulling that. [...] > We surely are interested in looking through 2.6.34.y drm patches to see which > ones we think look good. If you already got a tree prepared there, lets have a > look together. I have pushed my branch to: git://git.debian.org/kernel/linux-2.6.git#linux-2.6.32-drm33 (gitweb: http://git.debian.org/?p=kernel/linux-2.6.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/linux-2.6.32-drm33) [...] > - patches need to be tested to fix the reported issues > - we should prefer patches from upstream > - if backports are required or the patch only is relevant to .33, we should > require/ask for an ack from a subsystem maintainer. > - we probably should require (as upstream stable does) that patches are self > contained and small. Otherwise someone will come up with a giant backport > just because it fixes and issue. > - maybe some sort of review mechanism like Greg does would be useful [...] I agree with all of the above. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings We get into the habit of living before acquiring the habit of thinking. - Albert Camus
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature