Re: Reorganizing packages
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 02:07:23PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 02:11:48AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > I object; if and when there ever is a new upstream kernel branch that we
> > want to track separately this would have to be reverted, and in the meantime
> > it would cause more confusion and work because of the need to shuffle the
> > transition packages for users to get a smooth upgrade from etch.
> Hmm, anyone heard of a planned 2.7 or 2.8 tree? My last infos where 2.6
> is being kept for the time being.
yes current upstream stated plan is that there is no need for such trees.
as bonus it would separate dkt bug reports.