Re: Reorganizing packages
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 02:11:48AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> I object; if and when there ever is a new upstream kernel branch that we
> want to track separately this would have to be reverted,
No. We never had complete support for more than one branch. And I really
doubt that anyone wants the sarge-maintenance-problem back.
> and in the meantime
> it would cause more confusion and work because of the need to shuffle the
> transition packages for users to get a smooth upgrade from etch.
The linux-image packages are already in etch.
You can't evaluate a man by logic alone.
-- McCoy, "I, Mudd", stardate 4513.3