[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Reorganizing packages


On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 02:11:48AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> I object; if and when there ever is a new upstream kernel branch that we
> want to track separately this would have to be reverted, and in the meantime
> it would cause more confusion and work because of the need to shuffle the
> transition packages for users to get a smooth upgrade from etch.

Hmm, anyone heard of a planned 2.7 or 2.8 tree? My last infos where 2.6
is being kept for the time being.

Best regards
Frederik Schüler


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: