Hello, On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 02:11:48AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > I object; if and when there ever is a new upstream kernel branch that we > want to track separately this would have to be reverted, and in the meantime > it would cause more confusion and work because of the need to shuffle the > transition packages for users to get a smooth upgrade from etch. Hmm, anyone heard of a planned 2.7 or 2.8 tree? My last infos where 2.6 is being kept for the time being. Best regards Frederik Schüler -- ENOSIG
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature