Re: Modules packaging policy - call for discussion

To: debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Modules packaging policy - call for discussion
From: Frans Pop <aragorn@tiscali.nl>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 23:58:18 +0100
Message-id: <200603232358.27313.aragorn@tiscali.nl>
In-reply-to: <20060323203002.GC17524@localhost.localdomain>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0603222008391.3695@bobcat> <20060323174223.GB32186@dp.vpn.nusquama.org> <20060323203002.GC17524@localhost.localdomain>

On Thursday 23 March 2006 21:30, Sven Luther wrote:
> There are some minor technical hurdles to it, and a strong irrational
> opposition to it though, so it is probably going to stay a problem.

You don't learn, do you?

Attachment: pgph77fZkzknY.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

References:
- Modules packaging policy - call for discussion
  - From: Jurij Smakov <jurij@wooyd.org>
- Re: Modules packaging policy - call for discussion
  - From: Max Vozeler <max@nusquama.org>
- Re: Modules packaging policy - call for discussion
  - From: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>

Prev by Date: kernel-latest-2.6-i386_101sarge1_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Next by Date: Re: removal of svenl from the kernel team
Previous by thread: Re: Modules packaging policy - call for discussion
Next by thread: Re: Modules packaging policy - call for discussion
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread