Re: more current kernels for sarge in volatile?
On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 08:01:34AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Frans Pop wrote:
> > Also, using 2.6.12/14/15 in Sarge (volatile) IMO means that the kernel
> > team will need to commit to maintaining that version with regard to
> > security updates, just as for 2.6.8.
> > Continuously making the latest kernel available for Sarge through volatile
> > IMO is not an option, unless maybe done through a separate repository
> > kernel-volatile with all due warnings of "use at your own risk" attached.
>
> Including whatever kernel is in testing might work, hopefully that
> kernel would not have major development bugs and we[1] still have to
> support it for security.
Oh, i misread you, i favour the etch kernel myself. The alternative being some
random kernel tree out there whe have no support at all (security or other)
for right now, which i believe is not viable.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to: