Re: language of choice for k-p packaging ...
On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 08:39:58PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 08:03:59PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > This needs a reverse-lookup to generate the dependencies.
> > The dependencies can be set by hand, i believe, and don't really need to be
> > set by arch, the important thing is the list of actual tools used.
>
> Eek, you really want to depend against a tool which can't be used
> anyway?
Well. ...
> > Yeah, well. might be overkill for what we need, do we really need all this
> > complexity ?
>
> One or two levels of lookups don't really make a difference. But I think
> this makes it more robust.
Less nice to look at though :)
> > > I'm not sure about the linux-initramfs-tool part of the dependency.
> > That is a virtual package, so future ramdisk tool can satisft the dependency,
> > without needing to recompile the kernel.
>
> No, I was not sure how to handle this part of the dependency group.
Just add it by default always ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to: