[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: language of choice for k-p packaging ...



On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 04:20:56PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 03:50:09PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > I mean we need to find a way to override the k-p's default for ramdisk on a
> > per arch/subarch/flavour basis, and a ramdisk= line in the defines seems to be
> > most obvious place for this.
> 
> I currently try to implement such. My plan is something like:
> 
> arch/defines:
> | [base]
> | image-ramdisk-generators: initramfs-tools yaird
> | 
> | [relations]
> | initramfs-tools: initramfs-tools (>= foo)
> 
> arch/$arch/defines:
> | [base]
> | image-ramdisk-generators: yaird
> 
> Which makes it possible to generate both the dependencies and the
> correct order for each flavour.

Why not : 

ramdisk: initramfs-tools (>= foo) yaird

I mean, the ramdisk: is shorter and thus nicer than image-ramdisk-generators,
but more importantly, why the two levels ? Have you planed something else
where this is important ? 

> This may be extended with something like:
> arch/defines:
> | [relations]
> | toolchain-gcc: gcc (>= 4:4.0), binutils (>= foo)
> | toolchain-gcc-hppa: %(toolchain-gcc)s, gcc-hppa, binutils-hppa
> 
> To generate the toolchain-builddeps.

Nice, 

Friendly,

Sven Luther



Reply to: