Re: language of choice for k-p packaging ...
On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 09:19:53PM +0100, Maximilian Attems wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 12:38:39PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > On Sun, 13 Nov 2005 16:38:25 +0100, Maximilian Attems <maks@sternwelten.at> said:
> >
> > > On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 03:52:31PM +0100, Maximilian Attems wrote:
> > >> > Well, not wanting to relaunch the discussion at this, but i think
> > >> > Python rates really high on the most-uncomprehensible langugage
> > >> > contest, or at least as a language allowing or encouraging to
> > >> > write incomprehensible code :) Well, at least in the
> > >> > gencontrol.py incarnation of it. :)
> > >>
> >
> > > ohh you meant not kernel-package but kernel packaging sorry for my
> > > confusion.
> >
> > Oh, I see. I can't cancel my last post, so please accept my
> > apologies for massively misconstruing your older mail. I was being
> > way too defensice, I thought I was being accused of being a flamew
> > war started.
>
> sure.
> was my confusion in the first place, because of the subject "k-p"
> that's automatically kernel-package for me, will be more carefull.
Oh, my bad, indeed, sorry for having writen that.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to: