Sven Luther <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 03:33:06PM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
>> Hi, Sven Luther wrote:
>> > And sorry, upto now, your only arguments where dogma, white space and the
>> > monolitic nature of the patch.
>> If you s/dogma/experience with handling kernel patches/, all three points
>> are entirely valid reasons to reject a patch. (NB: you want "were".)
>> Split the thing now. You'll save yourself a whole lot of future work,
>> bugs, and frustration.
> And in the meantime, the user gets left in the Cold. I still don't see
Its also quite off the mark for amd64. The last kerel version had a 0 Byte
patch for amd64 and only the current one has some patches in there to
fix recent bugs.
Its not like amd64 has a 2MB big diff between upstream and usable
sources like mips-cvs has (had).