Hi, Sven Luther wrote:
> And sorry, upto now, your only arguments where dogma, white space and the
> monolitic nature of the patch.
If you s/dogma/experience with handling kernel patches/, all three points
are entirely valid reasons to reject a patch. (NB: you want "were".)
Split the thing now. You'll save yourself a whole lot of future work,
bugs, and frustration.
Besides, submitting the patch Upstream requires that this work gets
done anyway. Andrew/Linus won't consider applying big one-hunk patches.