[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: powerpc kernel-patch 2.6.6-5 in incoming since over a month !!!



On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 12:54:13PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 12:30:41PM +0200, Jens Schmalzing wrote:
> > The preliminary packages can be found in the usual location,
> > 
> >  deb http://www.theorie.physik.uni-muenchen.de/~jens/kernel-patch-powerpc ./
> >  deb http://www.theorie.physik.uni-muenchen.de/~jens/mol-modules ./
> 
> Can you please split the via ide hack from pegasos.diff into
> pegasos-via-ide-hacks.diff?

I will do that today, no problem ?

> The former is completely unproblematic to be applied for all kernels while
> the latter breaks all non-pegasos users of via82cxxx (and I'm not even
> sure whether there might be other ppc uses)

Well, i will modify the pegasos patch today to do a last cleanup, before ...

> Sven, any updates on talking to upstream about the pegasos changes?

... it could be in upstream.

I don't like the via-ide hack not being included, it makes the machine
unusable when a second ide disk is used. Did you tell me already where i
should best ask about this ? LKML, or linux-ide-devel or something such ?

> > They are currently based on linux-2.6.7.tar.bz2 from kernel.org with
> > all Debian patches applied, which means the tainted drivers are still
> > included.  Before I can upload anything, I need a kernel-source-2.6.7
> > package or at least a prune script.
> 
> I'll work on a script now, still looking for someone whoe could help
> on the packaging bits for a kernel-source-2.6.7 that uses split-patches.

Why not use dpatch ?

Works pretty well for other packages i handle myself. BAsically you have
to modify the debian/rules to call the dpatch stuff (3 to 4 lines
mostly) and then put all the patches in a debian/patches repository, and
hae those you want applied listed in a 00list or something such file
there.

Works pretty well, don't think you can have per arch/subarch patch
application though.

Friendly,

Sven Luther



Reply to: