[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: latest kde 3.1.2



[Interleaved quoting: please read to end for all comments]

Alexander Opitz wrote in gmane.linux.debian.user.kde: 
 about: Re: latest kde 3.1.2 

> Am Mittwoch, 21. Mai 2003 13:13 schrieb David Marsh:
> 
>> I have similar problems.
>> I'm running 'testing' and when I tried to upgrade to KDE 3.1.2,
> ......................^^^^^^^^
> 
> 
>> Now when I try to install KDE 3.1.2, using..
>> deb http://download.kde.org/stable/latest/Debian/ stable main
> ...............................................^^^^^^^^
> 
> 
> That's where the problems come from. 

I presume I was being naive in assuming that there was backwards
compatibility, that I could run code for an older system on a newer
system..? :-(

> But also there is no KDE version for testing.

None whatsoever?

Does this mean that I would have to downgrade back to stable
(is there an easy way to do that?) or upgrade to unstable (which I
definitely do not plan to do!). Drat..


>> Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies:
>>   kdelibs4: Depends: libarts1 (>= 1.1.2) but it is not going to be
>> installed Depends: libvorbis0 (>= 1.0rc3-1) but it is not installable
>> Depends: kdelibs-bin (= 4:3.1.2-0woody1)
> 
> Have you an up to date package file??

Yes.

> libarts (from testing) should depend on libvorbis0a (>=1.0.0) and this file is
> inside testing. Try again with libarts1 from testing.

I install libarts1 (1.1.2-1), but kdelibs4 (is this the first KDE
package I should install, I'm not sure what order the KDE packages
should be installed in), still complains:


Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies:
  kdelibs4: Depends: libarts1 (>= 1.1.2) but it is not going to be installed
            Depends: libvorbis0 (>= 1.0rc3-1) but it is not installable
            Depends: kdelibs-bin (= 4:3.1.2-0woody1)
E: Sorry, broken packages


which is bizarre as libarts1 (at the requested version) *is* installed,
and then I have the problem that it wantss libvorbis0 (not libvorbis0a)
again..

This is just going around in circles.. :-(


Thanks,


David.

-- 
David Marsh, Glasgow, Scotland, N Europe. | http://web.viewport.co.uk/
<email valid @time of writing>, but reply to list preferred, thanks.



Reply to: