Re: xinerama
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
> Ok...let me see if I can partially explain this. In order to include
> Xinerama support one must link to a static library, libXinerama.a, since
> it is not provided as a shared object. Unfortunaly this means compiling
> in PIC code into a shared object which is a no-no and against Debian
> policy. If you want to know the pro's, con's and the why's on all of
> this read through the debian-devel mailing list archives for the past
> couple months..you'll see several thread on this. Originally I found out
> about these problems when hppa tried building kdelibs. hppa's compiler
> refused to deal with it and thus a bug report was born. I originally deal
> with this by doing a "if arch is hppa don't compile in xinerama support"
> however after reading the discussion on all of this I decided the "right"
> solution was to not include xinerama support at this time. Once the
> Xinerama lib's are provided as shared objects I'll enable Xinerama support
> within the kde packages.
>
> Ivan
Would it be a horrible thing to have a kdelibs-xinerama-x86 , or maybe just a
quick howto on downloading the source deb for kdelibs and enabling xinerama?
It truly is 1000% better when using dualhead to have it supported by the
windowmanager....
If not, I could probably muddle my way through getting the source...
Hope you had a great weekend :-)
D.A.Bishop
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE7roEjKEJ4huP2XBERAhETAJ0bLXAXDWJUrOdss2vn9ki07L0PXwCfcRgN
vLYvTDrn5rLWh6CITUKfdVQ=
=dt4i
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to:
- References:
- xinerama
- From: David Bishop <david@bishop.dhs.org>
- Re: xinerama
- From: "Ivan E. Moore II" <rkrusty@tdyc.com>