Re: Browsers
On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 06:16:33PM +0100, Daniel Glassey wrote:
> This might be a horrible idea and I don't know offhand what policy
> is like on this kinda thing, nor how big it might be, but how about a
> statically linked galeon package that would conflict with gnome? task-
> junior could then include galeon | galeon-static. (er, this assumes that
> it can be compiled statically)
Ow. No, I don't think so. The Right Thing is for me to finish these
meta packages, stop fixating on every little thing that goes in, and then
move onwards with task-junior-gnome and task-junior-kde options. Mozilla
is fine for a task-junior base. People wishing to use galeon instead can
install that after the fact, and people wishing to go the whole nine yards
and do gnome can currently install task-junior plus task-gnome.
Ben
--
nSLUG http://www.nslug.ns.ca synrg@sanctuary.nslug.ns.ca
Debian http://www.debian.org synrg@debian.org
[ pgp key fingerprint = 7F DA 09 4B BA 2C 0D E0 1B B1 31 ED C6 A9 39 4F ]
[ gpg key fingerprint = 395C F3A4 35D3 D247 1387 2D9E 5A94 F3CA 0B27 13C8 ]
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Browsers
- From: Martin Butterweck <martin_butterweck@gmx.de>
- Re: Browsers
- From: "Daniel Glassey" <danglassey@yahoo.com>
- References:
- Browsers
- From: newslettersdf@cwcom.net
- Re: Browsers
- From: Ben Armstrong <synrg@sanctuary.nslug.ns.ca>
- Re: Browsers
- From: "Daniel Glassey" <danglassey@yahoo.com>