Re: Browsers
On 26 Jun 2001, at 14:23, Ben Armstrong sent forth the message:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 06:16:33PM +0100, Daniel Glassey wrote:
> > This might be a horrible idea and I don't know offhand what policy
> > is like on this kinda thing, nor how big it might be, but how about a
> > statically linked galeon package that would conflict with gnome? task-
> > junior could then include galeon | galeon-static. (er, this assumes that it
> > can be compiled statically)
>
> Ow. No, I don't think so. The Right Thing is for me to finish these
> meta packages, stop fixating on every little thing that goes in, and then
> move onwards with task-junior-gnome and task-junior-kde options. Mozilla
> is fine for a task-junior base. People wishing to use galeon instead can
> install that after the fact, and people wishing to go the whole nine yards
> and do gnome can currently install task-junior plus task-gnome.
ok, brain failure, that really was a daft idea ;) skipstone is plenty
good as a mozilla based browser without Gnome or KDE.
Daniel
P.S. I'm subscribed so no need to to or cc me
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: Browsers
- From: "Daniel Glassey" <danglassey@yahoo.com>
- Re: Browsers
- From: Ben Armstrong <synrg@sanctuary.nslug.ns.ca>