[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [Debian-med-packaging] Need help to update mhap package (build system changed from ant to maven)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256



على الثلاثاء 12 تـمـوز 2016 ‫21:42، كتب tony mancill:
> For a work-around, you can often overcome the lack of maven
> artifacts by explicitly telling maven how to resolve the dependency
> from the local filesystem.  This is done by modifying the pom.xml
> to set <scope> to "system" and <systemPath> appropriately for each
> build-dep JAR to find in /usr/share/java.  An example is the patch
> attached.
> 
> Come to think of it, perhaps I should have suggested this
> initially. However I think it's preferable to add the maven
> artifacts to the dependencies when possible, since that prevents
> every reverse build-dependency from having to create its own patch.
> (That is, let the build system do the work for you.)

Perfect! Thanks again.

> 
> In this case, it shouldn't be difficult to backport
> libfastutil-java if you'd prefer that.

I don't think that will be necessary, but thank you anyway.

Many thanks and regards
Afif

- -- 
Afif Elghraoui | عفيف الغراوي
http://afif.ghraoui.name
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJXhdimAAoJEFmyMG86+d3BRQYP/j21aHnR73YMwRaZgeX9HLlb
b/ckHf10jil5UXMX8aJyY5SPl8r3LdKBab79lwTysTNOo6y8JytaSC38TfK+hXMm
xnsHmEoqRAphW3InbTLiZceuXgY5vQ24MeA2pO/a0EShiAQhttv6FUe9ZqEKeHAY
YY9kfCkGPnlJGq2GjzLWkRTa9tC0No4olF6/R11tO5328Xwk9P2y4N/jcA7uTieS
zmI5ee8NwaCf5dAp+AerznkperAAOn0t8++Ui2YgcrqI4oMoBjzooW4WzHCIG8CI
IyuOhapSdpT9gFaUCV3TpiRAMUl9txodag7Qkzs0Jb/+4nDglET2X4KUBredme4F
f1I4DXYkC4jQsvv+KwvbfsiUd/mKtdK36FO1pmtrpg4O/+GfcNNjDd7/5mLLXL96
8DO0glu1zv/XrncFkqGCzcjfIoN779XsQ5EPAn2nG7AcoPSj3iBZwYCxlIyYS0C/
NCyFmQLiBkQyI6OSLPnQB+QcSbJDIIkhRHw0OlpZ7rO4Tnl3DX4ZxGByt5ngSu7z
oQQkHUqkr6deyQxzU+k7upbF0idCitxPX5NdqTOOm12Uj1Okj/VYco4JQ8Wi53Zk
KYURt3KR+TEkpio/KIwT+c0QJL8kUG3M4WlixCuRDH5u/ZP3DWGUEy8BwP+UHqm2
K4Y2DJjo/t215E2nFTf0
=KvAi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: