On 12.06.2015 16:02, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Le 11/06/2015 14:56, Markus Koschany a écrit : > >> I have no strong preference either way. I'm only a little concerned >> about the different kind of workflows. A bnd1 package requires to change >> all broken packages to this new binary package first, then we need to >> fix all other packages and eventually upload all together with the >> latest bnd version. Whereas a bnd2 package allows us to update every >> package one by one as time permits without disrupting any parallel >> occurring transitions. > > I agree this makes the transition more difficult, that's the price to > pay to keep sane package names I guess. Ok, let's do it. :) https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-java/bnd1.git
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature