On 07/26/2011 06:54 AM, Niels Thykier wrote: > I hope people can join even though I was late in getting them up an running. > I expect the Java Meeting will mostly be about do a status update/health > check on what we are doing (and what we should be doing). We can debate the > "Java Release Goals", multi-arch status for Java or whatever you'd like > (possibly except Jigsaw, which has its own thing later that day). Hi Niels, Thanks for organizing. I won't be able to attend, but wanted to propose a few minor topics for the Java Team Meeting: * Many of the packages using maven-repo-helper end up installing JARs under /usr/share/maven-repo/ and then symlinks in /usr/share/java/. Is this in violation of Java Policy? (Even if it's not, is there a reason not to have the actual JARs under /usj, provided that they're not private?) I think it would be nice if, by default, maven-repo-helper would assume that the JARs were non-private and thus should be installed in /usj. However, there may be technical reasons why this isn't feasible or palatable. * Is there any consensus on (or objection to) migrating team-maintained packages from svn to git? I'm thinking specifically about tomcat6 in the short-term but don't want to alienate other contributors. Thank you, tony
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature