[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: libswt and eclipse



I'm planning to adopt both. Essentially, what I need was azureus, but
then as a dependency I need to adopt swt-gtk. Since in the future I plan
to help maintaining eclipse, since it's orphaned right now, then I'm
killing two birds in one shot here. 

Best regards.

On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 23:03 +0200, Adnan Hodzic wrote:
> Adrian,
> 
> Are you planning to adopt both azureus and swt-gtk, or just swt-gtk?
> 
> Adnan
> 
> On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 15:12 -0400, Adrian Perez wrote:
> > Ok, I was expecting to upload it later, but since I got the answers from
> > the maintainer, then I'll upload it for weekend review to
> > mentors.debian. I know there's work to do still, but I've tested the
> > packages, they install-purge gracefully, are almost lintian-clean
> > (besides the fact that gives me debhelper-no-misc-depends). I've made a
> > few hello-world-kind of program using SWT without any compile or runtime
> > errors. Please keep an eye on it. I'll be working on it at the weekend
> > too, so if you could give your points earlier, that would be great.
> > 
> > On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 09:15 -0700, Shaun Jackman wrote:
> > > Hi Adrian,
> > > 
> > > I maintain SWT (swt-gtk) for Debian. If you send me the diff and dsc,
> > > I'll look over your work this weekend. Adnan Hodzic was also
> > > interested in adopting swt-gtk and azureus. If you like, you could
> > > collaborate with him. Thanks for considering adopting swt-gtk and
> > > azureus. They could use a maintainer that uses Azureus more frequently
> > > than I do.
> > > 
> > > Cheers,
> > > Shaun
> > > 
> > > 2009/6/25 Adrian Perez <adrianperez.deb@gmail.com>:
> > > > Thanks for your reply.
> > > > I know I could upload to mentors. But since it's quite ethical to
> > > > request the maintainer's feedback before adopting a package, I was
> > > > asking because I have no way of establishing contact with him, since
> > > > I've tried a lot in the last days.
> > > >
> > > > I'm currently doing some refinements, and planning to add the x86_64
> > > > and ppc versions as arch-patches.
> > > >
> > > > I think the previous maintainer could sponsor it, but because he is
> > > > probably off, then I should RFS it.
> > > >
> > > > Thank you all. Feedback welcome.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: