On Sat Jun 14 21:41, Benjamin Mesing wrote: > Do you refer to having to create seperate source packages here? > If so I believe, your statement is not true. The only section in the > policy which I can find to support that position, is the line: > Packages involving shared libraries should be split up into > several binary packages. > (from Chapter 8 - Shared libraries of the general policy) > But this refers only to binary packages and is only a SHOULD. Can you > please point out the section, that requires libraries to be shipped in a > separate source package? Oh sure, if the _source_ is distributed from upstream together then it can and probably should be a single source package. I was assuming that these were external libraries which were being distributed as jars with the source for this program. Matt -- Matthew Johnson
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature