W liście z wto, 11-02-2003, godz. 10:58, Ola Lundqvist pisze:
> Hi
>
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 09:57:53AM +0200, Kalle Kivimaa wrote:
> > Ola Lundqvist <opal@debian.org> writes:
> > > The package should also be renamed to liblog4-java. But there are a couple
> >
> > Shouldn't it be liblog4j-java as log4j is the name of the library?
>
> Well the software is pronounced log for java. It could be named
> liblog4j-java too but I can not see why the extra j should be there.
I would keep the "j" there for the sake of consistency.
It's often referred to as log4j not "log {for|4} java" FWIK.
GBP
--
Grzegorz B. Prokopski <gadek@debian.org>
Debian http://www.debian.org/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature