Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath

To: debian-java@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath
From: Jan Schulz <jasc.usenet@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2003 01:27:09 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20030903232709.GC25365@katzien.de>
Mail-followup-to: debian-java@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20030903095623.56556.qmail@web10005.mail.yahoo.com>
References: <[🔎] 20030902211020.GD31406@katzien.de> <[🔎] 20030903095623.56556.qmail@web10005.mail.yahoo.com>

Hallo Dalibor,

* Dalibor Topic wrote:
>If the packages need java, the executable, they should use whatever 'java' is
>in the PATH. If they need it to load
>sun.only.dedicated.morons.use.this.api.Main, then they are broken and need to
>be fixed. There is no reason to use JAVA_HOME.

I think we just agreed that this is simple not possible. Or so at
least I have parsed this discussion.

Jan
-- 
Jan Schulz                     jasc@gmx.net
     "Wer nicht fragt, bleibt dumm."

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath
  - From: Dalibor Topic <robilad@yahoo.com>

References:
- Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath
  - From: Jan Schulz <jasc.usenet@gmx.de>
- Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath
  - From: Dalibor Topic <robilad@yahoo.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath
Next by Date: Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath
Previous by thread: Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath
Next by thread: Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread