debian-java Sep 2003 by thread

[previous month]

[previous page]

Page 1 of 1

[next page]

[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath Jan Schulz

<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath Jan Schulz

Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath Daniel Bonniot

Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath Jan Schulz
Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath Daniel Bonniot
Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath Dalibor Topic
Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath Jan Schulz
Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath Dalibor Topic
Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath Jan Schulz
Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath Ben Burton
Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath Daniel Bonniot
Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath Jan Schulz
Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath Ben Burton

Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath Dalibor Topic

Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath Jan Schulz
Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath Dalibor Topic
Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath Jan Schulz
Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath Dalibor Topic
Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath Jan Schulz
Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath Dalibor Topic
Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath Jan Schulz
Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath Dalibor Topic
Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath Jan Schulz
Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath Ben Burton
Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath Dalibor Topic
Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath Ben Burton
Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath Matt Zimmerman
Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath Ben Burton
Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath Jan Schulz
Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath Ben Burton
JAVA_HOME and ant (was: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath) Jan Schulz
Re: JAVA_HOME and ant (was: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath) Ben Burton
Re: JAVA_HOME and ant (was: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath) Jan Schulz
Re: JAVA_HOME and ant (was: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath) Mark Wielaard
Re: JAVA_HOME and ant Jan Schulz
Re: JAVA_HOME and ant Mark Wielaard
Re: JAVA_HOME and ant Jan Schulz
Re: JAVA_HOME and ant Dalibor Topic
Re: JAVA_HOME and ant Jan Schulz
Re: JAVA_HOME and ant Dalibor Topic
Re: JAVA_HOME and ant Takashi Okamoto
Re: JAVA_HOME and ant Dalibor Topic
libant1.5-java for gjdoc Takashi Okamoto
Re: libant1.5-java for gjdoc Takashi Okamoto
Re: libant1.5-java for gjdoc Stefan Gybas
Re: libant1.5-java for gjdoc Ean Schuessler
Re: libant1.5-java for gjdoc Arnaud Vandyck
Re: JAVA_HOME and ant Dalibor Topic

Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath Dalibor Topic
[PROPOSAL] 3. RfD on new debian java policy Jan Schulz

Re: [PROPOSAL] 3. RfD on new debian java policy Jan Schulz
Re: [PROPOSAL] 3. RfD on new debian java policy Ben Burton
Re: [PROPOSAL] 3. RfD on new debian java policy Jan Schulz
Re: [PROPOSAL] 3. RfD on new debian java policy Ben Burton
Re: [PROPOSAL] 3. RfD on new debian java policy Jan Schulz
Re: [PROPOSAL] 3. RfD on new debian java policy Ben Burton
Re: [PROPOSAL] 3. RfD on new debian java policy Jan Schulz
Re: [PROPOSAL] 3. RfD on new debian java policy Dalibor Topic
Re: [PROPOSAL] 3. RfD on new debian java policy Jan Schulz
Re: [PROPOSAL] 3. RfD on new debian java policy Dalibor Topic
Re: [PROPOSAL] 3. RfD on new debian java policy Ben Burton
Re: [PROPOSAL] 3. RfD on new debian java policy Mark Wielaard
Re: [PROPOSAL] 3. RfD on new debian java policy Ben Burton
Re: [PROPOSAL] 3. RfD on new debian java policy Jan Schulz
Re: [PROPOSAL] 3. RfD on new debian java policy Mark Wielaard
Re: [PROPOSAL] 3. RfD on new debian java policy Jan Schulz
Re: [PROPOSAL] 3. RfD on new debian java policy Mark Wielaard
Re: [PROPOSAL] 3. RfD on new debian java policy Dalibor Topic
Re: [PROPOSAL] 3. RfD on new debian java policy Jan Schulz
Re: [PROPOSAL] 3. RfD on new debian java policy Ben Burton
Re: [PROPOSAL] 3. RfD on new debian java policy Jan Schulz
Re: [PROPOSAL] 3. RfD on new debian java policy Ben Burton
Re: [PROPOSAL] 3. RfD on new debian java policy Dalibor Topic
Re: [PROPOSAL] 3. RfD on new debian java policy Jan Schulz
Re: [PROPOSAL] 3. RfD on new debian java policy Dalibor Topic
Re: [PROPOSAL] 3. RfD on new debian java policy Jan Schulz
Re: [PROPOSAL] 3. RfD on new debian java policy Dalibor Topic
Re: [PROPOSAL] 3. RfD on new debian java policy Jan Schulz
Re: [PROPOSAL] 3. RfD on new debian java policy Dalibor Topic
Re: [PROPOSAL] 3. RfD on new debian java policy Daniel Bonniot
Re: [PROPOSAL] 3. RfD on new debian java policy Ben Burton
Re: [PROPOSAL] 3. RfD on new debian java policy Daniel Bonniot
Re: [PROPOSAL] 3. RfD on new debian java policy Dalibor Topic
Re: [PROPOSAL] 3. RfD on new debian java policy Jan Schulz
Re: [PROPOSAL] 3. RfD on new debian java policy Mark Wielaard
Re: [PROPOSAL] 3. RfD on new debian java policy Jan Schulz
Re: [PROPOSAL] 3. RfD on new debian java policy Mark Wielaard
Re: [PROPOSAL] 3. RfD on new debian java policy Jan Schulz
Re: [PROPOSAL] 3. RfD on new debian java policy Dalibor Topic
Re: [PROPOSAL] 3. RfD on new debian java policy Ben Burton
Re: [PROPOSAL] 3. RfD on new debian java policy Dalibor Topic
Re: [PROPOSAL] 3. RfD on new debian java policy Ben Burton
Re: [PROPOSAL] 3. RfD on new debian java policy Jan Schulz
Re: [PROPOSAL] 3. RfD on new debian java policy Dalibor Topic
Re: [PROPOSAL] 3. RfD on new debian java policy Ben Burton
Re: [PROPOSAL] 3. RfD on new debian java policy Jan Schulz
Re: [PROPOSAL] 3. RfD on new debian java policy Ben Burton
Re: [PROPOSAL] 3. RfD on new debian java policy Dalibor Topic
Re: [PROPOSAL] 3. RfD on new debian java policy Stefan Gybas
Re: [PROPOSAL] 3. RfD on new debian java policy Jan Schulz
[PROPOSAL] 4. RfD for a new debian java policy Jan Schulz
Re: [PROPOSAL] 4. RfD for a new debian java policy Dalibor Topic
Re: [PROPOSAL] 4. RfD for a new debian java policy Jan Schulz
Re: [PROPOSAL] 4. RfD for a new debian java policy Ben Burton
Re: [PROPOSAL] 4. RfD for a new debian java policy Jan Schulz
Re: [PROPOSAL] 4. RfD for a new debian java policy Ben Burton
Re: [PROPOSAL] 4. RfD for a new debian java policy Jan Schulz
Re: [PROPOSAL] 4. RfD for a new debian java policy Ben Burton
Re: [PROPOSAL] 4. RfD for a new debian java policy Jan Schulz
findjava requirement (was: 4. RfD for a new debian java policy) Ben Burton
Re: findjava requirement (was: 4. RfD for a new debian java policy) Jan Schulz
Re: findjava requirement (was: 4. RfD for a new debian java policy) Ben Burton
Re: findjava requirement (was: 4. RfD for a new debian java policy) Jan Schulz
Re: findjava requirement (was: 4. RfD for a new debian java policy) Ben Burton
Re: findjava requirement (was: 4. RfD for a new debian java policy) Jan Schulz
Re: findjava requirement (was: 4. RfD for a new debian java policy) Ben Burton
Re: findjava requirement (was: 4. RfD for a new debian java policy) Jan Schulz
Re: findjava requirement (was: 4. RfD for a new debian java policy) Dalibor Topic
Re: findjava requirement Jan Schulz
Re: findjava requirement Ean Schuessler
Re: findjava requirement Jan Schulz
Re: findjava requirement Ean Schuessler
Re: findjava requirement Jan Schulz
Re: findjava requirement Dalibor Topic
Re: findjava requirement Etienne Gagnon
Re: findjava requirement Ean Schuessler
Documenting "Debian JAVA_HOME" [was: Re: findjava requirement] Grzegorz B. Prokopski
Re: Documenting "Debian JAVA_HOME" [was: Re: findjava requirement] Jan Schulz
Re: findjava requirement Jan Schulz
Re: findjava requirement Jan Schulz
Re: findjava requirement Ben Burton
Re: findjava requirement T. Alexander Popiel
Re: findjava requirement Ben Burton
Re: findjava requirement T. Alexander Popiel
Re: findjava requirement T. Alexander Popiel
Re: findjava requirement Jan Schulz
Re: findjava requirement Ben Burton
Re: findjava requirement Jan Schulz
Re: findjava requirement Jan Schulz
Re: findjava requirement (was: 4. RfD for a new debian java policy) Jan Schulz

Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath Dalibor Topic

Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath Jan Schulz

Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath Dalibor Topic
Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath Jan Schulz
Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath Dalibor Topic

Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath Matt Zimmerman

Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath Jan Schulz

Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath Matt Zimmerman
Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath Jan Schulz
Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath Matt Zimmerman
Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath Jan Schulz
Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath T. Alexander Popiel
Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath Jan Schulz
Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath Dalibor Topic
Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath Jan Schulz
Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath Dalibor Topic
Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath Jan Schulz
Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath Ben Burton
Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath Jan Schulz
Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath Dalibor Topic
Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath Jan Schulz

Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath Ean Schuessler

Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath Jan Schulz
Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath Ean Schuessler
Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath Dalibor Topic
Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath Jan Schulz
Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath Dalibor Topic
Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath Jan Schulz
Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath Dalibor Topic
Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath Jan Schulz
Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath Dalibor Topic
Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath Jan Schulz
Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath Dalibor Topic
Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath Dalibor Topic
Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath Jan Schulz
Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath Dalibor Topic
Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath Jan Schulz
Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath Ben Burton
Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath Dalibor Topic
Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath Dalibor Topic

Re: CDBS class for Ant Arnaud Vandyck

Moving packages to main, was Re: CDBS class for Ant Stefan Gybas

Re: Moving packages to main, was Re: CDBS class for Ant Arnaud Vandyck

info request about p2p framework (fwd) MJ Ray

Re: info request about p2p framework (fwd) Dalibor Topic

Gcj version of Jar David Goodenough

Re: Gcj version of Jar Dalibor Topic

Re: Gcj version of Jar David Goodenough

Norton AntiVirus failed to scan an attachment in a message you sent. NAVMSE-MAILSRV1

<Possible follow-ups>
Norton AntiVirus failed to scan an attachment in a message you sent. NAVMSE-MAILSRV1

Running native eclipse on Debian (unstable/x86) Mark Wielaard
newer jikes may never get to testing (and thus stable) Grzegorz B. Prokopski

Re: newer jikes may never get to testing (and thus stable) Matt Zimmerman

Re: newer jikes may never get to testing (and thus stable) Grzegorz B. Prokopski

Re: newer jikes may never get to testing (and thus stable) Jan Schulz

Re: newer jikes may never get to testing (and thus stable) Ben Burton

Re: newer jikes may never get to testing (and thus stable) Dalibor Topic

Re: newer jikes may never get to testing (and thus stable) Matt Zimmerman

Re: newer jikes may never get to testing (and thus stable) Grzegorz B. Prokopski
Re: newer jikes may never get to testing (and thus stable) Adam Majer
Re: newer jikes may never get to testing (and thus stable) Ean Schuessler
Re: newer jikes may never get to testing (and thus stable) Grzegorz B. Prokopski
Re: newer jikes may never get to testing (and thus stable) Ean Schuessler
Re: newer jikes may never get to testing (and thus stable) Adam Majer
Re: newer jikes may never get to testing (and thus stable) Ean Schuessler
Re: newer jikes may never get to testing (and thus stable) Dalibor Topic
Re: newer jikes may never get to testing (and thus stable) Ean Schuessler

Re: http_proxy environment variable Oliver Scorp

Re: http_proxy environment variable Mark Howard

java-common_0.22_i386.changes ACCEPTED Debian Installer
Re: Java RC Bug Report David Jardine
is it OK to compile with Sun's JDK? D Crow

Re: is it OK to compile with Sun's JDK? Edward Murray

Seu/your email tinha/have virus VIRUS MANAGER
Installation troubles Alejandro Noli

Re: Installation troubles Tom Badran

Re: Installation troubles Alejandro Noli

Bibliografía !! Por Favor !!! ingelhornsistemas_linux
Back [was: Re: [VAC] until september 9] Arnaud Vandyck
Compiling java debian packages with free tools John Leuner

Re: Compiling java debian packages with free tools Mark Howard

Re: Compiling java debian packages with free tools Egon Willighagen

Re: Compiling java debian packages with free tools Jan Schulz

Re: Compiling java debian packages with free tools Dalibor Topic

Re: Compiling java debian packages with free tools Ean Schuessler
Re: Compiling java debian packages with free tools Grzegorz B. Prokopski
Re: Compiling java debian packages with free tools Mark Howard

Adding plugins for eclipse David Goodenough

Re: Adding plugins for eclipse Michael R Head

Re: Adding plugins for eclipse Jan Schulz

Re: Adding plugins for eclipse Jan Schulz

Fw: status of libxt-java Arnaud Vandyck
Installing non-debian java tar wcrowshaw

Re: Installing non-debian java tar Jan Schulz
Re: Installing non-debian java tar Tomasz Rola
Re: Installing non-debian java tar Jan Schulz

Bug#211070: ITP: libjazzy-java -- spell checker java library Arnaud Vandyck
Internet connections on windows? Tom Badran

Re: Internet connections on windows? Tom Badran

RFS: libsaxpath-java -- Java XPath engine for use on a variety of XML object models Arnaud Vandyck
Re: Re: [PROPOSAL] 4. RfD for a new debian java policy Etienne Gagnon

Re: [PROPOSAL] 4. RfD for a new debian java policy Jan Schulz

SableVM & Eclipse [Was: [PROPOSAL] 4. RfD for...] Etienne Gagnon

makefile or build Paolo Ariano
RFS: argouml (0.14-2) -- Modelling tool to help you do your design using UML Arnaud Vandyck
Fw: coIIege naive girIs ready for H/\RD /\CTlON tyY nIX j e kO UZy ZekPD Tilarot
[ANN] Viva The Java Republic! Forum Now Live at The Javalobby Gerald Bauer
why is there no gcjh-wrapper symlink? David Goodenough
Bug#212863: java-common: New java policy including tools to manage the changes Jan Schulz

Bug#212863: java-common: New java policy including tools to manage the changes Stefan Gybas

Bug#212863: [PROPSAL] New java policy including tools to manage the changes Jan Schulz

Help needed Pradeep CL
Unidentified subject! Ranjana Shakya
Processed: forgot to add control... Debian Bug Tracking System
RFS: libgnujaxp-java -- closes Bug#213199 Arnaud Vandyck

Re: RFS: libgnujaxp-java -- closes Bug#213199 Mark Howard

Re: RFS: libgnujaxp-java -- closes Bug#213199 Arnaud Vandyck

The last update was on 09:26 GMT Mon May 20. There are 257 messages. Page 1 of 1.

[previous month]

[previous page]

Page 1 of 1

[next page]

[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Mail converted by MHonArc