[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: NEVER USE SORBS



On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 12:53:22PM +0200, Mark wrote:
> >>If they say some IP is dynamic, they should have evidence for
> >>that. Why should I prove them that it is not??
> >
> >it's their list. they can have whatever criteria they like for it, and
> >you have no say in it at all. if other people agree with or at least
> >accept their criteria as being reasonable then they will use the list to
> >either block or tag mail. again, you have no say in that at all either.
> 
> Is that so? It's a double standard. 

how, exactly, is that a "double standard"? it looks perfectly consistent
to me. you don't get to tell someone else what their opinion must be.
their list, their rules. their opinion, their criteria. my mail server,
my rules. your mail server, your rules. and so on.


> A usable list by the public (us), and no say in how they operate      
> "their" list.                                                         

if you don't like it, don't use it. just remember that other people are
free to make their own decision about SORBS - whether you approve of
their choice or not.

> It has been said before, don't use SORBS if you don't want to support
> them.

don't use SORBS if you don't agree with their policies. but stop whining
about people who DO agree with them and have chosen to use one or more
of their lists.

craig

-- 
craig sanders <cas@taz.net.au>           (part time cyborg)



Reply to: