Re: OT: sorbs blacklisting scam
* Andy Smith (andy@lug.org.uk) [060430 16:03]:
> On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 10:57:28AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > On Sun, 30 Apr 2006, Juha-Matti Tapio wrote:
> > > There is no valid reason whatsoever to send bounces for spam. If you have a
> >
> > What should happen when someone sends mail from a spam trap [yes, forged],
> > to a valid address, WITHOUT any spam content (or content not filtered as
> > spam, it is the same), and that valid address bounces because its inbox is
> > full?
>
> Such a delivery failure should be rejected with a temp. failure
> which would not generate a bounce to the forged address.
Unless it stays a temporary failure until the retry time expires. Might
happen with users who read mail once per 14 days.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
Reply to: