Re: Which mail server?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 02/24/2006 12:46 PM, Mustafa Kutsal Ay wrote:
> yes, its quite true. i am sure qmail has patches to do both of the works.
>
> but, it is also the problem itself.
>
> qmail has too much patches, after patching so many times it becomes
> unstable.
>
> postfix is not good at performance comparing to qmail (i mean slightly
> slower), but it can do the same things in the painless way.
>
>
> ps: and i dont ever know any patch that qmail does all deliveries at
> one smtp transaction.
Just a quick note, qmail-ldap patch is pretty good, it
incorporates a lot of other patches in a single patch and it
is very well maintained by Andre Oppermann and Claud Jeker. I
don't like qmail patch structure or netqmail, but qmail-ldap
shows up as a very good solution to integrate with LDAP and
in certain aspects the approach is better than postfix-ldap
and exim-ldap. :-)
- --
Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
"Debian. Freedom to code. Code to freedom!"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Debian - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFD/y9UCjAO0JDlykYRAuoZAJ98KDMBwTF4nmgBaHXjmf78JLvvUQCffJBl
mY308lqZV+qntT/g9JlZ2fw=
=r1Jn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: