Re: blacklists
On Monday 06 December 2004 19:34, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
<avbidder@fortytwo.ch> wrote:
> Various AOL mailservers, the Debian mailservers, and other servers sending
> out lots of regular mail get listed in spamcop regularly, so my
> recommendation (and that of spamcop.net themselves, btw) is not to use
> bl.spamcop.net for blacklisting. Use it in spamassassin to score points.
Received: from johnny.adanco.com (151.adsl.as8758.net [212.25.16.151])
by murphy.debian.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B42442DED6
for <debian-isp@lists.debian.org>; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 02:34:01 -0600 (CST)
Received: from humphrey.adanco.local (humphrey.adanco.local [172.18.10.16])
by johnny.adanco.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24E4B2C6D
for <debian-isp@lists.debian.org>; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 09:34:01 +0100 (CET)
The Debian servers correctly preserve the Received: path. This is used by
Spamcop to assign blame to the correct server. Above are the original
Received: headers from your message to the list, if your message was reported
to Spamcop then it would send a complaint to abuse@dolphins.ch about IP
address 212.25.16.151.
If your message was reported to spamcop it would not list a Debian server, it
would list 212.25.16.151.
I doubt that Debian servers get listed regularly. I use the spamcop DNSBL and
it doesn't get in the way of Debian mailing lists.
--
http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/postal/ Postal SMTP/POP benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page
Reply to: