[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Comparison of antivirals for postfix on Debian



On Monday 15 September 2003 15:26, Chris Evans wrote:
[look at the subject...]

I recently started using clamav, mainly because it's free. Can't say anything 
about effectivity and performance yet.

But I also don't expect to catch many viruses in email since we're running

mime_header_checks:
===============
#/name\=\".*\.(com|exe|bat|cmd|pif|sh)\"$/       REJECT
/^Content-(Disposition|Type).*name\s*=\s*"?(.*\.(
        ade|adp|bas|bat|chm|cmd|com|cpl|crt|dll|eml|exe|hlp|hta|
        inf|ins|isp|js|jse|lnk|mdb|mde|mdt|mdw|msc|msi|msp|mst|nws|
        ops|pcd|pif|prf|reg|scf|scr|sct|shb|shs|shm|swf|url|
        vb|vbe|vbs|vbx|vxd|wsc|wsf|wsh))\"?\s*$/        REJECT Attachment name "$2" may not end with ".$3"
================

(activated by
mime_header_checks = regexp:/etc/postfix/mime_header_checks
in main.cf, of course)

anyway, so all of the recent trojans have been caught before they came to
the virus scanner. Word/Excel macro viruses seem to have declined, but for 
these you'll still need a virus scanner.

cheers
-- vbi



-- 
signature virus v1.0 - please use me in your own mail.

Attachment: pgpuSnyNRIPyx.pgp
Description: signature


Reply to: