Re: LSB and Debian, Commercial perspective
Not too sure myself. I've only caught things in passing about it. They
seem to be quite invovled in the LSB process but I have yet to find an
official announcement stating that it is certified by the LSB. My guess
is that the rpm thing is going to be a stalling point. Though, as
mentioned previously, rpm support is available, it is not the preferred
method of package installation which seems to be what the LSB wants.
Todd
On Thu, 2002-10-10 at 08:31, Gene Grimm wrote:
> From: "Todd Charron" <tcharron@mnsi.net>
> >
> > I would much prefer the LSB to support .deb as an alternative then to
> > have the rpm support provided by Debian be what "squeaks" it by for
> > certification. After all, if you're getting support from an LSB
> > certified tech they might just say "install this rpm..." rather then
> > know the more appropriate solution for debian (which might just be "grab
> > this deb from the archive").
>
> This may be a dumb question, as I haven't had time to fully review this
> myself, but where does Debian stand with certification?
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-isp-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
Reply to: