Re: LSB and Debian, Commercial perspective
If I recall correctly part of the LSB requires using the rpm package
format... if that's a requirement preventing debian from being certified
i'm not too sure i'm interested in the LSB...
Todd
On Wed, 2002-10-09 at 21:21, Jason Lim wrote:
> Dear Joey,
>
> ----------------------------
> This package provides an implementation of version 1.1.0 of the Linux
> Standard Base for Debian on the Intel x86 architecture with the Linux
> kernel. Future revisions may support the LSB on additional architectures
> and kernels.
>
> The intent of this package is to provide a best current practice way of
> installing and running LSB packages on Debian GNU/Linux. Its presence does
> not imply that we believe that Debian fully complies with the Linux
> Standard Base, and should not be construed as a statement that Debian is
> LSB-compliant.
> ----------------------------
>
> That does not address what I was talking about. _EVEN IF_ Debian had a
> hack or such which allowed it to appear compatible/compliant, it isn't
> certified, is it? And back to my original topic... if it isn't officially
> compliant, vendors won't support it.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Joey Hess" <joeyh@debian.org>
> To: <debian-isp@lists.debian.org>
> Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 6:48 AM
> Subject: Re: LSB and Debian, Commercial perspective
>
> Jason Lim wrote:
> > What are your thoughts on this?
>
> I think you should perhaps apt-get install lsb and read the
> README.Debian.
>
> --
> see shy jo
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-isp-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
Reply to: