Re: [Fwd: Re: Spamassasin over RBL, was Re: rblsmtpd -t?]
On Wed, 8 May 2002, Craig Sanders wrote:
> On Tue, May 07, 2002 at 07:25:21PM +1000, Jason Lim wrote:
> > > if any of the above are true, then the site should be black-listed.
> > > regardless of company size.
> >
> > So, with 1 spam complaint against it, regardless of size, then that
> > company should be blacklisted.
>
> will you get it through your thick head? this has nothing to do with
> "complaints". it has everything to do with spam received.
Sorry, but he doesn't deserve that comment. My question to you: how will
a source-blacklisting RBL know that people have received a certain
amount of spam from a certain source, other than from complaints from
the receivers of the spam?
Cheers,
Emile.
--
E-Advies / Emile van Bergen | e-advies@evbergen.xs4all.nl
tel. +31 (0)70 3906153 | http://www.e-advies.info
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-isp-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: