Re: load balancer
On Fri, 16 Mar 2001, Marcel Hicking wrote:
> Przemyslaw Wegrzyn <czajnik@tower.t16.ds.pwr.wroc.pl> 16 Mar 2001, at
> 10:17:
> > On 15 Mar 2001, Fraser Campbell wrote:
> > > Allen Ahoffman <ahoffman@announce.com> writes:
> > > > Is there a distribution that will cheaply replace a load
> balancer?
> > > > e.g. for web servers. LVS, ...?
> > >
> > > man ipmasqadm ... you'll see this:
> > >
> > > Redirect all web traffic to internals hostA and hostB,
> > > where hostB will serve 2 times hostA connections. Forward
> > > rules already masq internal hosts to outside (typical).
> > >
> > > ipchains -I input -p tcp -y -d yours.com/32 80 -m 1
> > > ipmasqadm mfw -I -m 1 -r hostA 80 -p 10 ipmasqadm mfw
> > > -I -m 1 -r hostB 80 -p 20
> > >
> > > Voila, load balancer ... any Linux distribution can do this.
> >
> > :)) And what about sessions ?
>
> As session data is usually stored in a database,
Not always..
> have the sql server on a separate machine (you
> would anyway if you have enough traffic to need
> a load balancer, wouldn't you?)
Generaly, right...
Greetings
Reply to: