[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: V.90 card for Linux?



BRI = Basic Rate Interface--a 2-channel ISDN line.  So it looks like we're
talking about the same thing.

That sounds like what I would need...  Where did you get your channel
splitter?  What's the price range on one of those things?  I presume
cheap, but I've never priced one before.  :-)

Thanks for the response.


On Sun, 24 Oct 1999, Michelle Konzack wrote:

> Hello and good morning,
> 
> Sorry, I do not know what you mean with BRI.
> 
> But for me: I am using 4 USR Courier-I 56k (ISDN + V.90) 
> with Debian 2.1, pppd and 2 ISDN lines with chanel splitter.
> 
> The Modems are ISA cards and working like a com port.
> They are working quiet well and without any problems.
> 
> Webmistress Michelle
> >From Strasbourg-France
> 
> 
> At 01:10 24.10.1999 -0500, you wrote
> --------> This was the original Message:
> MK>I may soon have the need to provide 2-4 56k dialup lines for some
> MK>customers to dial into my network to upload web pages and do some light
> MK>web browsing, e-mail, etc. What seems to make the most sense to me would
> MK>be to order two BRI lines, and do two V.90 lines per BRI (for a total of 4
> MK>V.90 capable lines).  Does anyone know of any Linux-compatible hardware
> MK>capable of doing V.90 over a BRI? 
> MK>
> MK>If not an ISA/PCI card, how about any low-end cheap RAS equipment?
> MK>Perhaps a PortMaster 2e, but that seems a bit like overkill to me, if all
> MK>I'm doing is four lines...
> MK>
> MK>Any other thoughts/suggestions?
> MK>
> --------> The Reply begins not here, it is at the beginning ^
> 

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
  Jonathan Hall  *  jonhall@futureks.net  *  PGP public key available
 Systems Admin, Future Internet Services; Goessel, KS * (316) 367-2487
         http://www.futureks.net  *  PGP Key ID: FE 00 FD 51
         -=  Running Debian GNU/Linux 2.0, kernel 2.0.36  =-
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Reply to: