Re: Local Admin question
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Martin Koeppe wrote:
> What kind of problems does "id" cause for you? I can't remember any, and
> am just curious. You may also replace some of the core utils with the
> Debian versions, see:
coreutils' 'id' doesn't support -D, for example. OTOH Interix' 'install'
*doesn't* support -D (although a different -D...), which some Debian
> This shouldn't confuse Debian. I saw and fixed some (very few) packages
> with that issue, but these packages are rare. If you encounter such a
> package, please report.
Will do. It just struck me as dodgy.
> To cite Rodney: When you do an "id -D" what do you get for an output?
> If you take the uid from the above command and do "id <uid>" what happens?
id -D (using Interix' ID):
), 66820(NT AUTHORITY+INTERACTIVE), 66827(NT
AUTHORITY+AuthenticatedUsers), 4095(CurrentSession), 66048(+LOCAL), 1049680
FNORD is the name of my domain. DG-PC is the name of my machine.
id 1049757 produces this if I use Interix' version:
131616(+Administrators), 131617(+Users), 66820(+INTERACTIVE),
66827(+Authenticated Users), 4095(CurrentSession), 66048(+LOCAL), 1049680
If I use coreutils' version of 'id', I just get:
id: 1049757: No such user
This is when logged in as myself. When logged in as Administrator,
networking works fine.
>> No other information, and AD is something I know very little about. I am
>> on a machine on a remote domain, if that makes any difference.
> What do you mean by "remote domain"?
Sorry, I don't know any of the correct terminology... all my account
information is held on a server operated by someone else that's about
6000 miles away. This means that I don't have very much control over
what it says about me (and is also the reason why I can't log in as
Administrator). Also, it makes operations that need to look up account
info very slow; the id command above take ~10 seconds to run, and 'ls
- -l' can take an age.
>> One other oddity I've noticed: apt-get source fails after the downloads
>> with 'Failed to create child process'. OTOH dpkg-source -x works fine.
> Those kind of errors may be fixed by the core hotfixes (those which
> update posix.exe, psxdll.dll, psxss.exe, psxrun.exe).
I've managed to install the emboldened hotfixes, those, but am still
kinda confused about the order in which I should install them --- given
that a lot of the hotfixes replace the same files, which one gives me
the most recent version of the core files? Right now I've got version
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----